Who is better, Amundrud or Bogdanova?
Gail Amundrud leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.5 for Yuliya Bogdanova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gail Amundrud and Yuliya Bogdanova level at 77.5. Gail Amundrud leads on Longevity, Statistics. Yuliya Bogdanova leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Amundrud wins: Longevity, Statistics
Bogdanova wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/gail-amundrud-vs-yuliya-bogdanova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Amundrud leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Amundrud | 0 | 0 | 55 | 128 | 368 | 478 |
| 🇷🇺 Bogdanova | 0 | 0 | 60 | 134 | 400 | 666 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AmundrudRetired | BogdanovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Commonwealth Games gold medals | 1 | — |
| Commonwealth Games medals | 4 | — |
| Canadian titles | 5 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World records | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| National titles | — | 6 |
| Global finals contested | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Gail Amundrud leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.5 for Yuliya Bogdanova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bogdanova scores higher on peak, dominance. Amundrud leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Amundrud: 77.5, Bogdanova: 77.5.
Make your case for Amundrud vs Bogdanova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.