Who is better, Sobers or Hutton?
Garfield Sobers leads with a GOAT score of 91.1 against 90.9 for Len Hutton — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Sobers vs Hutton
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Garfield Sobers above Len Hutton: 91.1 vs 90.9. Garfield Sobers leads on Dominance, Longevity. Len Hutton leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SobersWinner
91.1Sobers wins: Dominance, Longevity
Hutton
90.9Hutton wins: Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/garfield-sobers-vs-len-hutton
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Garfield Sobers
91.1
Sobers leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Garfield Sobers
2. Len Hutton
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Len Hutton5 years played · career day 2,921310 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Garfield Sobers5 years played · career day 2,555281 runs
-9.4% vs Hutton at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Sobers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 153 | 409 |
| 🇬🇧 Hutton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 130 | 380 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Sobers91.1
Hutton90.9
FAQ
Where does Hutton beat Sobers?
Hutton scores higher on peak, statistics. Sobers leads on dominance, longevity.
How is the Sobers vs Hutton score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sobers: 91.1, Hutton: 90.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sobers vs Hutton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.