Who is better, Gaudio or Söderling?
Gastón Gaudio leads with a GOAT score of 77.4 against 77.3 for Robin Söderling — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gaudio vs Söderling
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gastón Gaudio above Robin Söderling: 77.4 vs 77.3. Gastón Gaudio leads on Longevity. Robin Söderling leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GaudioWinner
77.4Gaudio wins: Longevity
Söderling
77.3Söderling wins: Dominance
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/gaston-gaudio-vs-robin-soderling
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇷 Gastón Gaudio
77.4
Gaudio leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Gastón Gaudio
2. Robin Söderling
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇷 Gastón Gaudio5 seasons played · career day 2,5567 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Robin Söderling5 seasons played · career day 2,5557 titles
0.0% vs Gaudio at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Gaudio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 |
| 🇸🇪 Söderling | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gaudio77.4
Söderling77.3
FAQ
Where does Söderling beat Gaudio?
Söderling scores higher on dominance. Gaudio leads on longevity.
How is the Gaudio vs Söderling score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gaudio: 77.4, Söderling: 77.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gaudio vs Söderling. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.