Who is better, Keady or Jordan?
Michael Jordan leads with a GOAT score of 95.3 against 85.1 for Gene Keady — a gap of 10.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michael Jordan above Gene Keady: 95.3 vs 85.1. Michael Jordan leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Gene Keady leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jordan wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Keady wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/gene-keady-vs-jordan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jordan leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Keady — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Keady — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | KeadyRetired | JordanRetired · Washington Wizards |
|---|---|---|
| Big Ten titles | 6 | — |
| College coaching wins | 550 | — |
| National Coach of the Year awards | 6 | — |
| NCAA tournament appearances | 18 | — |
| Seasons as a head coach | 25 | — |
| NBA titles | — | 6 |
| Finals MVP | — | 6 |
| Regular season MVP | — | 5 |
| Scoring titles | — | 10 |
| Points per game | — | 30.1 |
| All-Star selections | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 99 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 100 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 97 |
Michael Jordan leads with a GOAT score of 95.3 against 85.1 for Gene Keady — a gap of 10.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Keady scores higher on longevity. Jordan leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Keady: 85.1, Jordan: 95.3.
Make your case for Keady vs Jordan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.