Who is better, Golovkin or Pacquiao?
Gennady Golovkin leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.3 for Manny Pacquiao — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gennady Golovkin above Manny Pacquiao: 90.6 vs 90.3. Gennady Golovkin leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Manny Pacquiao leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Golovkin wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Pacquiao wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/gennady-golovkin-vs-manny-pacquiao
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Golovkin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇿 Golovkin | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 292 | 644 |
| 🇵🇭 Pacquiao | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GolovkinRetired | PacquiaoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Middleweight title defences | 20 | — |
| Professional wins | 42 | — |
| Knockouts | 37 | 39 |
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| World title reigns | 2 | — |
| World titles | — | 12 |
| Weight divisions | — | 8 |
| Career wins | — | 62 |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | — | 3 |
| Lineal titles | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 90 |
Gennady Golovkin leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.3 for Manny Pacquiao — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pacquiao scores higher on longevity. Golovkin leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Golovkin: 90.6, Pacquiao: 90.3.
Make your case for Golovkin vs Pacquiao. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.