Who is better, G. Dibaba or Farah?
Genzebe Dibaba leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Mo Farah — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Genzebe Dibaba and Mo Farah level at 86.3. Genzebe Dibaba leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Mo Farah leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →G. Dibaba wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Farah wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/genzebe-dibaba-vs-mo-farah
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
G. Dibaba leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 G. Dibaba | 0 | 0 | 62 | 132 | 288 | 747 |
| 🇬🇧 Farah | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | G. DibabaRetired | FarahRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World record 1500 m | 3.501 | — |
| World Championship golds | 1 | 6 |
| World Indoor golds | 3 | — |
| World records set | 5 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| European golds | — | 5 |
| 5000 m best (s) | — | 766.59 |
| 10,000 m best (s) | — | 1,602.52 |
| Major marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Genzebe Dibaba leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Mo Farah — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Farah scores higher on honours, longevity. G. Dibaba leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. G. Dibaba: 86.3, Farah: 86.3.
Make your case for G. Dibaba vs Farah. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.