Who is better, G. Dibaba or Boston?
Genzebe Dibaba leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Ralph Boston — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Genzebe Dibaba and Ralph Boston level at 86.3. Genzebe Dibaba leads on Longevity, Peak. Ralph Boston leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →G. Dibaba wins: Peak, Longevity
Boston wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/genzebe-dibaba-vs-ralph-boston
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
G. Dibaba leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 G. Dibaba | 0 | 0 | 62 | 132 | 288 | 747 |
| 🇺🇸 Boston | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | G. DibabaRetired | BostonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World record 1500 m | 3.501 | — |
| World Championship golds | 1 | — |
| World Indoor golds | 3 | — |
| World records set | 5 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World records | — | 6 |
| Best long jump in metres | — | 8.35 |
| AAU titles | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Genzebe Dibaba leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Ralph Boston — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boston scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. G. Dibaba leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. G. Dibaba: 86.3, Boston: 86.3.
Make your case for G. Dibaba vs Boston. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.