Who is better, Arnold or Bainbridge?
Phil Bainbridge leads with a GOAT score of 81.7 against 81.3 for Geoff Arnold — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Phil Bainbridge above Geoff Arnold: 81.7 vs 81.3. Phil Bainbridge leads on Honours, Longevity. Geoff Arnold leads on Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bainbridge wins: Longevity, Honours
Arnold wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/geoff-arnold-vs-phil-bainbridge
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bainbridge leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Arnold | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 277 | 593 |
| 🇬🇧 Bainbridge | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 294 | 610 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ArnoldRetired | BainbridgeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 115 | — |
| First-class wickets | 1,130 | 348 |
| Test average | 28 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls in Tests | 6 | — |
| Tests played | 34 | — |
| First-class runs | — | 13,656 |
| First-class centuries | — | 17 |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Year | — | 1 |
| First-class matches | — | 322 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Phil Bainbridge leads with a GOAT score of 81.7 against 81.3 for Geoff Arnold — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Arnold scores higher on dominance, statistics. Bainbridge leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Arnold: 81.3, Bainbridge: 81.7.
Make your case for Arnold vs Bainbridge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.