Who is better, Hughes or Edmondson?
Geoff Hughes leads with a GOAT score of 75.9 against 75.8 for Mark Edmondson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Geoff Hughes above Mark Edmondson: 75.9 vs 75.8. Geoff Hughes leads on Statistics, Longevity. Mark Edmondson leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hughes wins: Longevity, Statistics
Edmondson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/geoff-hughes-tennis-vs-mark-edmondson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hughes leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Hughes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 41 | 69 |
| 🇦🇺 Edmondson | 0 | 0 | 45 | 115 | 381 | 661 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HughesRetired | EdmondsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 1 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup ties played | 6 | — |
| National tournament wins | 5 | — |
| Career years | 11 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 1 |
| Major doubles titles | — | 5 |
| Career singles titles | — | 6 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 15 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 66 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 74 |
Geoff Hughes leads with a GOAT score of 75.9 against 75.8 for Mark Edmondson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Edmondson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Hughes leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hughes: 75.9, Edmondson: 75.8.
Make your case for Hughes vs Edmondson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.