GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Boycott vs Donald

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BoycottWinner
87.0

Boycott wins: Longevity, Statistics

Donald
87.0

Donald wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/geoffrey-boycott-vs-allan-donald

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Geoffrey Boycott
87.0

Boycott leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Scored 8,114 Test runs and 151 first-class centuries in a famously disciplined career.

1. Geoffrey Boycott
87.0
2. Allan Donald
87.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇿🇦 Allan Donald5 years played · career day 1,825281 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Geoffrey Boycott5 years played · career day 1,826225 runs
-19.9% vs Donald at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Boycott003575170495
🇿🇦 Donald004088281633

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBoycottRetiredDonaldRetired
Test runs8,114
Test centuries22
Batting average48
First-class centuries151
Tests played10872
Test wickets330
Bowling average22
Five-wicket hauls20
ODI wickets272
Dominance w25%8288
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%9278
Honours w20%8084
Statistics w15%9492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Boycott87.0
Donald87.0
The people
Boycott
Donald

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Boycott vs Donald. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →