Who is better, Grozer or Torres?
Georg Grozer leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.1 for Regla Torres — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Georg Grozer above Regla Torres: 82.2 vs 82.1. Georg Grozer leads on Longevity, Statistics. Regla Torres leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Grozer wins: Longevity, Statistics
Torres wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/georg-grozer-vs-regla-torres
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Grozer leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Grozer | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 240 | 682 |
| 🇨🇺 Torres | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 51 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrozerActive | TorresRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| World League MVP awards | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Club European titles | 2 | — |
| Years at the top level | 21 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Grand Prix titles | — | 4 |
| Player of the Century | — | 1 |
| MVP awards | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Georg Grozer leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.1 for Regla Torres — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Torres scores higher on dominance, honours. Grozer leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Grozer: 82.2, Torres: 82.1.
Make your case for Grozer vs Torres. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.