GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Connor vs Owen

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConnorWinner
83.9

Connor wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Owen
83.9

Owen wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/george-connor-vs-steve-owen

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 George Connor
83.9

Connor leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. All-Pro on both sides of the ball for the Chicago Bears.

1. George Connor
83.9
2. Steve Owen
83.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 George Connor5 seasons played · career day 1,826366 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Steve Owen5 seasons played · career day 1,826360 touchdowns
-1.6% vs Connor at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Connor0050112270532
🇺🇸 Owen0050111266628

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricConnorRetiredOwenRetired
All-Pro selections52
Pro Bowls4
Positions played All-Pro2
Seasons played810
Games played90106
NFL titles1
Points allowed in 192720
Dominance w25%8482
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%7480
Honours w20%8486
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Connor83.9
Owen83.9
The people
Connor
Owen

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Connor vs Owen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →