GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Davis vs Cochrane

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DavisWinner
86.3

Davis wins: Longevity, Statistics

Cochrane
86.2

Cochrane wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Baseball

Shareable URL · /compare/george-davis-baseball-vs-mickey-cochrane

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 George Davis
86.3

Davis leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Switch-hitting shortstop who starred in the 1906 World Series win.

1. George Davis
86.3
2. Mickey Cochrane
86.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Home runs per season

Career timeline · Home runs per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Home runs per season
1. 🇺🇸 Mickey Cochrane5 seasons played · career day 1,8251.6 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 George Davis5 seasons played · career day 1,8251.5 home runs
-6.3% vs Cochrane at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Davis000.2640.5531.5012.821
🇺🇸 Cochrane000.3310.6041.5662.887

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDavisRetiredCochraneRetired
Career hits2,665
Career batting average0.2950.32
Career stolen bases616
World Series titles13
Seasons played20
MVP awards2
All-Star selections2
Career OPS0.897
Dominance w25%8286
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%9076
Honours w20%8088
Statistics w15%9290

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Davis86.3
Cochrane86.2
The people
Davis
Cochrane

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Davis vs Cochrane. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →