Who is better, Duckworth or Raj?
George Duckworth leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 86.0 for Mithali Raj — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks George Duckworth above Mithali Raj: 86.2 vs 86.0. George Duckworth leads on Honours, Peak, Statistics. Mithali Raj leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Duckworth wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Raj wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/george-duckworth-vs-mithali-raj
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Duckworth leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Duckworth | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 294 | 642 |
| 🇮🇳 Raj | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 289 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DuckworthRetired | RajRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class dismissals | 1,095 | — |
| Test dismissals | 60 | — |
| Ashes series won | 3 | — |
| Tests played | 24 | — |
| Seasons played | 25 | — |
| ODI runs | — | 7,805 |
| International runs | — | 10,868 |
| ODI centuries | — | 7 |
| World Cup finals | — | 2 |
| ODI average | — | 50.68 |
| Consecutive ODI fifties | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
George Duckworth leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 86.0 for Mithali Raj — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Raj scores higher on dominance, longevity. Duckworth leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Duckworth: 86.2, Raj: 86.0.
Make your case for Duckworth vs Raj. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.