Who is better, Foreman or Gushiken?
George Foreman leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Yoko Gushiken — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores George Foreman and Yoko Gushiken level at 85.8. George Foreman leads on Longevity. Yoko Gushiken leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Foreman wins: Longevity
Gushiken wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/george-foreman-vs-yoko-gushiken
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Foreman leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Foreman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 44 |
| 🇯🇵 Gushiken | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 21 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ForemanRetired | GushikenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Career wins | 76 | — |
| Knockouts | 68 | — |
| Years between title reigns | 20 | — |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | 2 | — |
| World title defences | — | 13 |
| Professional wins | — | 23 |
| Knockout wins | — | 15 |
| Professional losses | — | 1 |
| World titles won | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
George Foreman leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Yoko Gushiken — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gushiken scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Foreman leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Foreman: 85.8, Gushiken: 85.8.
Make your case for Foreman vs Gushiken. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.