Who is better, Headley or Hobbs?
George Headley leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.6 for Jack Hobbs — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Headley vs Hobbs
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores George Headley and Jack Hobbs level at 90.6. George Headley leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Jack Hobbs leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HeadleyWinner
90.6Headley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Hobbs
90.6Hobbs wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/george-headley-vs-jack-hobbs
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇲 George Headley
90.6
Headley leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. George Headley
2. Jack Hobbs
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇯🇲 George Headley5 years played · career day 2,921350 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Jack Hobbs5 years played · career day 2,55529 runs
-91.7% vs Headley at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Headley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 135 | 405 |
| 🏴 Hobbs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 49 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Headley90.6
Hobbs90.6
FAQ
Where does Hobbs beat Headley?
Hobbs scores higher on longevity. Headley leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Headley vs Hobbs score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Headley: 90.6, Hobbs: 90.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Headley vs Hobbs. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.