Who is better, McAfee or Barney?
George McAfee leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.3 for Lem Barney — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
McAfee vs Barney
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores George McAfee and Lem Barney level at 85.3. George McAfee leads on Honours. Lem Barney leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McAfeeWinner
85.3McAfee wins: Honours
Barney
85.3Barney wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/george-mcafee-vs-lem-barney
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 George McAfee
85.3
McAfee leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. George McAfee
2. Lem Barney
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Lem Barney5 seasons played · career day 1,825424 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 George McAfee5 seasons played · career day 1,826401 touchdowns
-5.4% vs Barney at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 McAfee | 0 | 0 | 55 | 152 | 325 | 638 |
| 🇺🇸 Barney | 0 | 0 | 96 | 186 | 424 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
McAfee85.3
Barney85.3
FAQ
Where does Barney beat McAfee?
Barney scores higher on longevity. McAfee leads on honours.
How is the McAfee vs Barney score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McAfee: 85.3, Barney: 85.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for McAfee vs Barney. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.