Who is better, McNamara or Kiprusoff?
Miikka Kiprusoff leads with a GOAT score of 80.9 against 80.5 for George McNamara — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Miikka Kiprusoff above George McNamara: 80.9 vs 80.5. Miikka Kiprusoff leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. George McNamara leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kiprusoff wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
McNamara wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/george-mcnamara-vs-miikka-kiprusoff
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kiprusoff leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 McNamara | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 320 | 642 |
| 🇫🇮 Kiprusoff | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 89 | 232 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McNamaraRetired | KiprusoffRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Games played | 132 | — |
| Career goals | 55 | — |
| Allan Cup titles as builder | 1 | — |
| Vezina Trophies | — | 1 |
| William M. Jennings Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL wins | — | 319 |
| Career shutouts | — | 44 |
| Stanley Cup Final appearances | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Miikka Kiprusoff leads with a GOAT score of 80.9 against 80.5 for George McNamara — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McNamara scores higher on honours. Kiprusoff leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McNamara: 80.5, Kiprusoff: 80.9.
Make your case for McNamara vs Kiprusoff. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.