Who is better, Mikan or Hortência?
George Mikan leads with a GOAT score of 88.1 against 88.1 for Hortência Marcari — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores George Mikan and Hortência Marcari level at 88.1. George Mikan leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Hortência Marcari leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mikan wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Hortência wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/george-mikan-nba-vs-hortencia-marcari
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mikan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Mikan | 0 | 0 | 60 | 130 | 396 | 700 |
| 🇧🇷 Hortência | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 226 | 604 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MikanRetired | HortênciaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 5 | — |
| Scoring titles | 3 | — |
| Career points per game | 23.1 | — |
| All-NBA first teams | 6 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship points per game | — | 23 |
| South American titles | — | 8 |
| Career national team points | — | 3,000 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
George Mikan leads with a GOAT score of 88.1 against 88.1 for Hortência Marcari — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hortência scores higher on statistics, longevity. Mikan leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mikan: 88.1, Hortência: 88.1.
Make your case for Mikan vs Hortência. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.