Who is better, Patterson or Zvonareva?
Vera Zvonareva leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 84.2 for Gerald Patterson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Vera Zvonareva above Gerald Patterson: 84.3 vs 84.2. Vera Zvonareva leads on Longevity, Statistics. Gerald Patterson leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Zvonareva wins: Longevity, Statistics
Patterson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/gerald-patterson-vs-vera-zvonareva
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Zvonareva leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Patterson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 🇷🇺 Zvonareva | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 161 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PattersonRetired | ZvonarevaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 3 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 5 | 3 |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 2 | — |
| Career span in years | 19 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 2 |
| WTA singles titles | — | 12 |
| Career high ranking | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Vera Zvonareva leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 84.2 for Gerald Patterson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Patterson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Zvonareva leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Patterson: 84.2, Zvonareva: 84.3.
Make your case for Patterson vs Zvonareva. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.