Who is better, Heaney or Iginla?
Geraldine Heaney leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Jarome Iginla — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Geraldine Heaney and Jarome Iginla level at 88.0. Geraldine Heaney leads on Honours, Dominance. Jarome Iginla leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Heaney wins: Dominance, Honours
Iginla wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/geraldine-heaney-vs-jarome-iginla
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Heaney leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Heaney | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 86 |
| 🇨🇦 Iginla | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 246 | 690 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HeaneyRetired | IginlaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 7 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Canada caps | 125 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Career goals | — | 625 |
| Career points | — | 1,300 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| Rocket Richard Trophies | — | 2 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 92 |
Geraldine Heaney leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 88.0 for Jarome Iginla — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Iginla scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Heaney leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Heaney: 88.0, Iginla: 88.0.
Make your case for Heaney vs Iginla. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.