Who is better, Ederle or Manaudou?
Gertrude Ederle leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 83.9 for Laure Manaudou — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gertrude Ederle above Laure Manaudou: 84.0 vs 83.9. Gertrude Ederle leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Laure Manaudou leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ederle wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Manaudou wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/gertrude-ederle-vs-laure-manaudou
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ederle leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ederle | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 22 |
| 🇫🇷 Manaudou | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EderleRetired | ManaudouRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| Olympic bronze medals | 2 | — |
| World records set | 29 | — |
| English Channel crossings | 1 | — |
| Channel record margin in hours | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship golds | — | 5 |
| European Championship golds | — | 13 |
| World records | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Gertrude Ederle leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 83.9 for Laure Manaudou — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Manaudou scores higher on honours, longevity. Ederle leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ederle: 84.0, Manaudou: 83.9.
Make your case for Ederle vs Manaudou. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.