Who is better, GeT_RiGhT or Kramer?
Kramer leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.0 for Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kramer above Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund: 77.3 vs 77.0. Kramer leads on Longevity, Statistics. Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kramer wins: Longevity, Statistics
GeT_RiGhT wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/getright-vs-kramer-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kramer leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 GeT_RiGhT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.54 |
| 🇰🇷 Kramer | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 302 | 584 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GeT_RiGhTRetired | KramerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| HLTV Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| Top-20 appearances | 7 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | 30 | — |
| LAN win streak | 87 | — |
| Career prize money (USD) | 700,000 | — |
| Worlds appearances | — | 2 |
| LPL playoff runs | — | 4 |
| LCK seasons | — | 4 |
| Career seasons | — | 9 |
| Career playoff series | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 78 |
Kramer leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.0 for Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
GeT_RiGhT scores higher on peak. Kramer leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. GeT_RiGhT: 77.0, Kramer: 77.3.
Make your case for GeT_RiGhT vs Kramer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.