Who is better, GeT_RiGhT or Uzi?
Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund leads with a GOAT score of 77.0 against 76.5 for Jian "Uzi" Zi-Hao — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund above Jian "Uzi" Zi-Hao: 77.0 vs 76.5. Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund leads on Longevity, Honours. Jian "Uzi" Zi-Hao leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GeT_RiGhT wins: Longevity, Honours
Uzi wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/getright-vs-uzi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
GeT_RiGhT leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 GeT_RiGhT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.54 |
| 🇨🇳 Uzi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 19 | 46 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GeT_RiGhTRetired | UziRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| HLTV Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| Top-20 appearances | 7 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | 30 | — |
| LAN win streak | 87 | — |
| Career prize money (USD) | 700,000 | 700,000 |
| Worlds finals | — | 2 |
| LPL titles | — | 2 |
| MSI titles | — | 1 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 1 |
| LPL MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 80 |
Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund leads with a GOAT score of 77.0 against 76.5 for Jian "Uzi" Zi-Hao — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Uzi scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. GeT_RiGhT leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. GeT_RiGhT: 77.0, Uzi: 76.5.
Make your case for GeT_RiGhT vs Uzi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.