Who is better, Boniperti or Southall?
Giampiero Boniperti leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.6 for Neville Southall — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Giampiero Boniperti and Neville Southall level at 85.6. Giampiero Boniperti leads on Statistics, Longevity, Honours. Neville Southall leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Boniperti wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Southall wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/giampiero-boniperti-vs-neville-southall
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Boniperti leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Boniperti | 0 | 0 | 8 | 35 | 94 | 149 |
| 🏴 Southall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 204 | 644 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BonipertiRetired | SouthallRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Serie A titles | 5 | — |
| Juventus goals | 178 | — |
| Serie A top scorer awards | 1 | — |
| Italy caps | 38 | — |
| Juventus appearances | 469 | — |
| League titles | — | 2 |
| FA Cups | — | 2 |
| European Cup Winners' Cups | — | 1 |
| FWA Footballer of the Year | — | 1 |
| Wales caps | — | 92 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 80 |
Giampiero Boniperti leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.6 for Neville Southall — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Southall scores higher on peak, dominance. Boniperti leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Boniperti: 85.6, Southall: 85.6.
Make your case for Boniperti vs Southall. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.