GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hodges vs Blyleven

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HodgesWinner
87.9

Hodges wins: Peak, Honours

Blyleven
87.9

Blyleven wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Baseball

Shareable URL · /compare/gil-hodges-vs-bert-blyleven

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Gil Hodges
87.9

Hodges leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Eight-time All-Star who later managed the 1969 Miracle Mets to the title.

1. Gil Hodges
87.9
2. Bert Blyleven
87.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Home runs per season

Career timeline · Home runs per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Home runs per season
1. 🇺🇸 Gil Hodges5 seasons played · career day 3,286107 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇱 Bert Blyleven5 seasons played · career day 1,82580 home runs
-25.2% vs Hodges at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Hodges00001107
🇳🇱 Blyleven00102680136

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHodgesRetiredBlylevenRetired
World Series titles as player2
World Series titles as manager1
Career home runs370
Gold Gloves3
All-Star selections82
Career strikeouts3,701
Career wins287
Career shutouts60
World Series titles2
Dominance w25%8284
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%8892
Honours w20%8882
Statistics w15%9294

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hodges87.9
Blyleven87.9
The people
Hodges
Blyleven

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hodges vs Blyleven. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →