Who is better, Villeneuve or K. Rosberg?
Gilles Villeneuve leads with a GOAT score of 71.1 against 71.1 for Keke Rosberg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gilles Villeneuve and Keke Rosberg level at 71.1. Gilles Villeneuve leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Keke Rosberg leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Villeneuve wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
K. Rosberg wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/gilles-villeneuve-vs-keke-rosberg
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Villeneuve leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Villeneuve | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 🇫🇮 K. Rosberg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VilleneuveRetired | K. RosbergRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix wins | 6 | 5 |
| Podiums | 13 | 17 |
| Pole positions | 2 | 5 |
| Race starts | 67 | 114 |
| Championship runner-up | 1 | — |
| Fastest laps | 8 | 3 |
| World titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 60 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 72 | 70 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteGilles Villeneuve leads with a GOAT score of 71.1 against 71.1 for Keke Rosberg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
K. Rosberg scores higher on honours, longevity. Villeneuve leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Villeneuve: 71.1, K. Rosberg: 71.1.
Make your case for Villeneuve vs K. Rosberg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.