Who is better, Chapple or Rohit?
Glen Chapple leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.8 for Rohit Sharma — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Glen Chapple above Rohit Sharma: 84.9 vs 84.8. Glen Chapple leads on Longevity, Statistics. Rohit Sharma leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chapple wins: Longevity, Statistics
Rohit wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/glen-chapple-vs-rohit-sharma
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chapple leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Chapple | 0 | 0 | 45 | 93 | 200 | 526 |
| 🇮🇳 Rohit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 400 | 2,300 | 5,440 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChappleRetired | RohitActive · Mumbai Indians |
|---|---|---|
| First-class wickets | 985 | — |
| County championships as captain | 1 | — |
| First-class runs | 8,000 | — |
| Seasons played | 25 | — |
| One-day international caps | 1 | — |
| ODI runs | — | 11,000 |
| ODI centuries | — | 32 |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| ODI double centuries | — | 3 |
| IPL titles as captain | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Glen Chapple leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.8 for Rohit Sharma — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rohit scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Chapple leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chapple: 84.9, Rohit: 84.8.
Make your case for Chapple vs Rohit. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.