Who is better, Chapple or Mandhana?
Glen Chapple leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.8 for Smriti Mandhana — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Glen Chapple above Smriti Mandhana: 84.9 vs 84.8. Glen Chapple leads on Longevity. Smriti Mandhana leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chapple wins: Longevity
Mandhana wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/glen-chapple-vs-smriti-mandhana
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chapple leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Chapple | 0 | 0 | 45 | 93 | 200 | 526 |
| 🇮🇳 Mandhana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 168 | 400 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChappleRetired | MandhanaActive |
|---|---|---|
| First-class wickets | 985 | — |
| County championships as captain | 1 | — |
| First-class runs | 8,000 | — |
| Seasons played | 25 | — |
| One-day international caps | 1 | — |
| ODI runs | — | 4,000 |
| ODI centuries | — | 10 |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| T20I runs | — | 3,500 |
| Career-high ODI ranking | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Glen Chapple leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.8 for Smriti Mandhana — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mandhana scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Chapple leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chapple: 84.9, Mandhana: 84.8.
Make your case for Chapple vs Mandhana. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.