Who is better, Alozie or Baulch?
Glory Alozie leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 81.0 for Jamie Baulch — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Glory Alozie and Jamie Baulch level at 81.0. Glory Alozie leads on Dominance. Jamie Baulch leads on Honours, Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Alozie wins: Dominance
Baulch wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/glory-alozie-vs-jamie-baulch
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Alozie leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Alozie | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
| 🇬🇧 Baulch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46.2 | 181.47 | 363.07 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlozieRetired | BaulchRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| African records | 1 | — |
| 100 m hurdles personal best | 12.44 | — |
| European indoor titles | 1 | — |
| World indoor golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship relay golds | — | 1 |
| 400 m best | — | 44.57 |
| Commonwealth medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Glory Alozie leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 81.0 for Jamie Baulch — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baulch scores higher on honours, statistics, longevity. Alozie leads on dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alozie: 81.0, Baulch: 81.0.
Make your case for Alozie vs Baulch. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.