GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Gossage vs Hartnett

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GossageWinner
87.6

Gossage wins: Longevity

Hartnett
87.6

Hartnett wins: Dominance, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Baseball

Shareable URL · /compare/goose-gossage-vs-gabby-hartnett

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Goose Gossage
87.6

Gossage leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Hall of Fame closer with 310 saves across 22 major league seasons.

1. Goose Gossage
87.6
2. Gabby Hartnett
87.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Home runs per season

Career timeline · Home runs per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Home runs per season
1. 🇺🇸 Goose Gossage5 seasons played · career day 2,921109 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Gabby Hartnett5 seasons played · career day 1,8251.3 home runs
-98.8% vs Gossage at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Gossage000026142
🇺🇸 Hartnett000.1940.4621.3252.533

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGossageRetiredHartnettRetired
Career saves310
All-Star selections96
World Series titles1
Career ERA3.01
Career strikeouts1,502
MVP awards1
Career home runs236
Career batting average0.297
Pennants won4
Dominance w25%8284
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%9288
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%9092

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gossage87.6
Hartnett87.6
The people
Gossage
Hartnett

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Gossage vs Hartnett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →