Who is better, Howe or Bowman?
Scotty Bowman leads with a GOAT score of 96.0 against 94.2 for Gordie Howe — a gap of 1.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Scotty Bowman above Gordie Howe: 96.0 vs 94.2. Scotty Bowman leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Gordie Howe leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bowman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Howe wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/gordie-howe-vs-scotty-bowman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Howe leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Bowman — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Howe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 427 |
| 🇨🇦 Bowman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 223 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HoweRetired | BowmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 4 | — |
| Hart Trophies | 6 | — |
| Art Ross Trophies | 6 | — |
| NHL points | 1,850 | — |
| NHL goals | 801 | — |
| All-Star selections | 23 | — |
| Stanley Cups as coach | — | 9 |
| Career coaching wins | — | 1,244 |
| Jack Adams Awards | — | 2 |
| Seasons as a head coach | — | 30 |
| Playoff series wins | — | 92 |
| Dominance w25% | 93 | 97 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 95 |
| Honours w20% | 93 | 97 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 94 |
Scotty Bowman leads with a GOAT score of 96.0 against 94.2 for Gordie Howe — a gap of 1.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Howe scores higher on longevity. Bowman leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Howe: 94.2, Bowman: 96.0.
Make your case for Howe vs Bowman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.