GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Banks vs Mac Allister

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BanksWinner
78.6

Banks wins: Peak, Longevity

Mac Allister
78.6

Mac Allister wins: Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/gordon-banks-vs-alexis-mac-allister

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Gordon Banks
78.6

Banks leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Gordon Banks
78.6
2. Alexis Mac Allister
78.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Through age 21 · Goals per season
1. 🇬🇧 Gordon Banks23 goals
1 season by age 21 · 23 per season

Setting the pace at age 21

2. 🇦🇷 Alexis Mac Allister7 goals
3 seasons by age 21 · 2.3 per season

Mac Allister is -69.6% behind Banks's pace at age 21

Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.

MetricBanksRetiredMac AllisterActive
World Cup titles1—
England caps73—
Career league appearances510—
League Cup titles1—
FWA Footballer of the Year awards1—
World Cup Winner—1
Copa América titles—2
Premier League apps—110
Career league goals—39
Argentina caps—54
Dominance w25%7878
Peak w20%9082
Longevity w20%7875
Honours w20%7580
Statistics w15%7078

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Banks78.6
Mac Allister78.6
The people
Banks
Mac Allister

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Banks or Mac Allister?

Gordon Banks leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Alexis Mac Allister — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Mac Allister beat Banks?

Mac Allister scores higher on honours, statistics. Banks leads on peak, longevity.

How is the Banks vs Mac Allister score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Banks: 78.6, Mac Allister: 78.6.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Banks vs Mac Allister. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →