Who is better, Banks or Mac Allister?
Gordon Banks leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Alexis Mac Allister — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Banks wins: Peak, Longevity
Mac Allister wins: Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/gordon-banks-vs-alexis-mac-allister
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Banks leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
Mac Allister is -69.6% behind Banks's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BanksRetired | Mac AllisterActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| England caps | 73 | — |
| Career league appearances | 510 | — |
| League Cup titles | 1 | — |
| FWA Footballer of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| World Cup Winner | — | 1 |
| Copa América titles | — | 2 |
| Premier League apps | — | 110 |
| Career league goals | — | 39 |
| Argentina caps | — | 54 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 75 |
| Honours w20% | 75 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 70 | 78 |
Gordon Banks leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Alexis Mac Allister — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mac Allister scores higher on honours, statistics. Banks leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Banks: 78.6, Mac Allister: 78.6.
Make your case for Banks vs Mac Allister. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.