GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Lowe vs Renshaw

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LoweWinner
82.4

Lowe wins: Longevity, Statistics

Renshaw
82.4

Renshaw wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/gordon-lowe-vs-william-renshaw

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Gordon Lowe
82.4

Lowe leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Australasian champion in 1915 and a long-serving Davis Cup player.

1. Gordon Lowe
82.4
2. William Renshaw
82.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇬🇧 William Renshaw5 seasons played · career day 1,826378 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Gordon Lowe5 seasons played · career day 1,825303 titles
-19.8% vs Renshaw at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Lowe0050105303640
🇬🇧 Renshaw0055120282660

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLoweRetiredRenshawRetired
Grand Slam singles titles1
Davis Cup ties14
Seasons played23
National titles2
World top-ten rankings3
Wimbledon singles titles7
Consecutive Wimbledon titles6
Wimbledon doubles titles5
Major finals8
Seasons on tour10
Dominance w25%7688
Peak w20%8694
Longevity w20%8862
Honours w20%8086
Statistics w15%8480

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Lowe82.4
Renshaw82.4
The people
Lowe
Renshaw

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Lowe vs Renshaw. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →