Who is better, Souness or Nedvěd?
Graeme Souness leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.3 for Pavel Nedvěd — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Graeme Souness and Pavel Nedvěd level at 85.3. Graeme Souness leads on Honours, Dominance. Pavel Nedvěd leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Souness wins: Dominance, Honours
Nedvěd wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/graeme-souness-vs-pavel-nedved
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Souness leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Souness | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 278 | 630 |
| 🇨🇿 Nedvěd | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 35 | 74 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SounessRetired | NedvědRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Cups | 3 | — |
| League titles with Liverpool | 5 | — |
| League Cups | 4 | — |
| Scotland caps | 54 | — |
| Scottish league titles | 3 | — |
| Ballon d'Or | — | 1 |
| Serie A titles | — | 2 |
| Cup Winners' Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Czech Republic caps | — | 91 |
| Serie A appearances | — | 327 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 82 |
Graeme Souness leads with a GOAT score of 85.3 against 85.3 for Pavel Nedvěd — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Nedvěd scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Souness leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Souness: 85.3, Nedvěd: 85.3.
Make your case for Souness vs Nedvěd. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.