Who is better, Drinkwater or Johnson?
Graham Drinkwater leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 83.8 for Tom Johnson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Graham Drinkwater above Tom Johnson: 84.0 vs 83.8. Graham Drinkwater leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Tom Johnson leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Drinkwater wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Johnson wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/graham-drinkwater-vs-tom-johnson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Drinkwater leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Drinkwater | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 490 |
| 🇨🇦 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 269 | 565 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DrinkwaterRetired | JohnsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 5 | 6 |
| Seasons played | 7 | — |
| Career goals | 42 | — |
| Games played | 48 | — |
| Cup-winning seasons in a row | 3 | — |
| Norris Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL games | — | 978 |
| Career points | — | 264 |
| All-Star Games | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Graham Drinkwater leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 83.8 for Tom Johnson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Johnson scores higher on longevity. Drinkwater leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Drinkwater: 84.0, Johnson: 83.8.
Make your case for Drinkwater vs Johnson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.