Who is better, Brits or Franklin?
Grant Brits leads with a GOAT score of 82.0 against 81.8 for Missy Franklin — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Grant Brits above Missy Franklin: 82.0 vs 81.8. Grant Brits leads on Longevity, Statistics. Missy Franklin leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brits wins: Longevity, Statistics
Franklin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/grant-brits-vs-missy-franklin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brits leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Brits | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 336 | 696 |
| 🇺🇸 Franklin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 126 | 500.56 | 885.06 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BritsActive | FranklinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 6 |
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| Commonwealth Games medals | 2 | — |
| Australian titles | 4 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 5 |
| World Championship golds | — | 11 |
| World records | — | 2 |
| 200 m backstroke record (s) | — | 124.06 |
| Golds at one Worlds | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Grant Brits leads with a GOAT score of 82.0 against 81.8 for Missy Franklin — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Franklin scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Brits leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brits: 82.0, Franklin: 81.8.
Make your case for Brits vs Franklin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.