Who is better, Hill or Crawford?
Grant Hill leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Joan Crawford — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Grant Hill above Joan Crawford: 86.8 vs 86.7. Grant Hill leads on Peak, Statistics. Joan Crawford leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hill wins: Peak, Statistics
Crawford wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/grant-hill-vs-joan-crawford-basketball
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hill leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hill | 0 | 0 | 50 | 116 | 387 | 725 |
| 🇺🇸 Crawford | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 254 | 689 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HillRetired | CrawfordRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 7 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| Career points | 17,137 | — |
| Rookie of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| AAU All-American selections | — | 11 |
| AAU national titles | — | 8 |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| Pan American gold medals | — | 1 |
| Seasons at national level | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Grant Hill leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Joan Crawford — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Crawford scores higher on dominance, honours. Hill leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hill: 86.8, Crawford: 86.7.
Make your case for Hill vs Crawford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.