Who is better, Hill or Arizin?
Paul Arizin leads with a GOAT score of 86.9 against 86.8 for Grant Hill — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hill vs Arizin
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Paul Arizin above Grant Hill: 86.9 vs 86.8. Paul Arizin leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Grant Hill leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ArizinWinner
86.9Arizin wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Hill
86.8Hill wins: Peak, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BasketballShareable URL · /compare/grant-hill-vs-paul-arizin
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Paul Arizin
86.9
Arizin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Paul Arizin
2. Grant Hill
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Grant Hill5 seasons played · career day 1,825387 points per game
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Paul Arizin5 seasons played · career day 1,825359 points per game
-7.2% vs Hill at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hill | 0 | 0 | 50 | 116 | 387 | 725 |
| 🇺🇸 Arizin | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 359 | 703 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Arizin86.9
Hill86.8
FAQ
Where does Hill beat Arizin?
Hill scores higher on peak, longevity. Arizin leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Hill vs Arizin score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hill: 86.8, Arizin: 86.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hill vs Arizin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.