Who is better, Neale or Witten?
Greasy Neale leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.8 for Jason Witten — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Greasy Neale above Jason Witten: 83.0 vs 82.8. Greasy Neale leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Jason Witten leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Neale wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Witten wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/greasy-neale-vs-jason-witten
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Neale leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Neale | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 266 | 602 |
| 🇺🇸 Witten | 0 | 0 | 347 | 1,327 | 3,983 | 7,909 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NealeRetired | WittenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Series titles | 1 | — |
| World Series batting average | 357 | — |
| Professional football seasons | 3 | — |
| Career receptions | 30 | 1,228 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Pro Bowl selections | — | 11 |
| Career receiving yards | — | 13,046 |
| All-Pro first teams | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 90 |
Greasy Neale leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.8 for Jason Witten — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Witten scores higher on statistics, longevity. Neale leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Neale: 83.0, Witten: 82.8.
Make your case for Neale vs Witten. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.