GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chappell vs Inzamam

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChappellWinner
88.5

Chappell wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Inzamam
88.4

Inzamam wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/greg-chappell-vs-inzamam-ul-haq

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Greg Chappell
88.5

Chappell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Scored 7,110 Test runs at 53.86 and captained Australia with distinction.

1. Greg Chappell
88.5
2. Inzamam-ul-Haq
88.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Greg Chappell5 years played · career day 1,825271 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Inzamam-ul-Haq5 years played · career day 1,825195 runs
-28.0% vs Chappell at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Chappell004087271617
🇵🇰 Inzamam002062195386

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChappellRetiredInzamamRetired
Test runs7,1108,830
Test centuries2425
Batting average54
Tests as captain48
Tests played87
ODI runs11,739
World Cup titles1
Test batting average49.6
Dominance w25%8884
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%8290
Honours w20%8686
Statistics w15%9492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chappell88.5
Inzamam88.4
The people
Chappell
Inzamam

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chappell vs Inzamam. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →