Who is better, Paltrinieri or Klochkova?
Gregorio Paltrinieri leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.9 for Yana Klochkova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gregorio Paltrinieri and Yana Klochkova level at 87.9. Gregorio Paltrinieri leads on Longevity. Yana Klochkova leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Paltrinieri wins: Longevity
Klochkova wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/gregorio-paltrinieri-vs-yana-klochkova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Paltrinieri leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Paltrinieri | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 25 |
| 🇺🇦 Klochkova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.77 | 30.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PaltrinieriActive | KlochkovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 5 | — |
| World Championship golds | 7 | 5 |
| European Championship golds | 15 | — |
| World records | 1 | 1 |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| 400m medley best (min) | — | 4.33 |
| European titles | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteGregorio Paltrinieri leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.9 for Yana Klochkova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Klochkova scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Paltrinieri leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Paltrinieri: 87.9, Klochkova: 87.9.
Make your case for Paltrinieri vs Klochkova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.