Who is better, Gretzky or Kharlamov?
Wayne Gretzky leads with a GOAT score of 97.8 against 89.9 for Valeri Kharlamov — a gap of 7.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wayne Gretzky above Valeri Kharlamov: 97.8 vs 89.9. Wayne Gretzky leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gretzky wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Kharlamov wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/gretzky-vs-valeri-kharlamov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gretzky leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Kharlamov — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | GretzkyRetired · New York Rangers | KharlamovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career points | 2,857 | — |
| Career goals | 894 | — |
| Stanley Cups | 4 | — |
| Hart Trophies | 9 | — |
| Art Ross Trophies | 10 | — |
| Points per game | 1.92 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 8 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 11 |
| Soviet league goals | — | 293 |
| Soviet Player of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 97 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 92 |
Wayne Gretzky leads with a GOAT score of 97.8 against 89.9 for Valeri Kharlamov — a gap of 7.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kharlamov does not lead any of the five categories; Gretzky is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gretzky: 97.8, Kharlamov: 89.9.
Make your case for Gretzky vs Kharlamov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.