Who is better, Dimitrov or Fraser?
Neale Fraser leads with a GOAT score of 79.2 against 79.1 for Grigor Dimitrov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Neale Fraser above Grigor Dimitrov: 79.2 vs 79.1. Neale Fraser leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Grigor Dimitrov leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fraser wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Dimitrov wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/grigor-dimitrov-vs-neale-fraser
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fraser leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇬 Dimitrov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
| 🇦🇺 Fraser | 0 | 0 | 48 | 105 | 334 | 640 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DimitrovActive | FraserRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Finals titles | 1 | — |
| ATP titles | 9 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 1 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 3 | — |
| Career match wins | 450 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 3 |
| US Championships titles | — | 2 |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 1 |
| Major doubles titles | — | 11 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Neale Fraser leads with a GOAT score of 79.2 against 79.1 for Grigor Dimitrov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dimitrov scores higher on statistics, longevity. Fraser leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dimitrov: 79.1, Fraser: 79.2.
Make your case for Dimitrov vs Fraser. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.