Who is better, Espeseth or Heynckes?
Gro Espeseth leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.1 for Jupp Heynckes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gro Espeseth and Jupp Heynckes level at 85.1. Gro Espeseth leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Jupp Heynckes leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Espeseth wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Heynckes wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/gro-espeseth-v-vs-jupp-heynckes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Espeseth leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 Espeseth | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 351 | 681 |
| 🇩🇪 Heynckes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 44 | 170 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EspesethRetired | HeynckesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Norway caps | 111 | — |
| European Championship titles | 1 | 1 |
| Norway goals | 14 | — |
| Bundesliga goals | — | 220 |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 4 |
| Champions League titles as coach | — | 2 |
| Bundesliga top scorer awards | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 90 |
Gro Espeseth leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.1 for Jupp Heynckes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Heynckes scores higher on statistics, longevity. Espeseth leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Espeseth: 85.1, Heynckes: 85.1.
Make your case for Espeseth vs Heynckes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.