Who is better, Alexander or Williams?
Grover Cleveland Alexander leads with a GOAT score of 91.8 against 91.8 for Ted Williams — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Grover Cleveland Alexander and Ted Williams level at 91.8. Grover Cleveland Alexander leads on Peak. Ted Williams leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Alexander wins: Peak
Williams wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/grover-cleveland-alexander-vs-ted-williams
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Alexander leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Alexander | 0 | 0 | 28 | 47 | 127 | 208 |
| 🇺🇸 Williams | 0 | 0 | 0.327 | 0.671 | 1.775 | 3.147 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlexanderRetired | WilliamsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career wins | 373 | — |
| Career shutouts | 90 | — |
| Pitching Triple Crowns | 3 | — |
| World Series titles | 1 | — |
| Career ERA | 2.56 | — |
| Batting titles | — | 6 |
| MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Triple Crowns | — | 2 |
| Home runs | — | 521 |
| Career on-base percentage | — | 0.482 |
| All-Star selections | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 95 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 89 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 96 |
Grover Cleveland Alexander leads with a GOAT score of 91.8 against 91.8 for Ted Williams — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Williams scores higher on honours. Alexander leads on peak.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alexander: 91.8, Williams: 91.8.
Make your case for Alexander vs Williams. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.