Who is better, Fijałek or Pires?
Grzegorz Fijałek leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Sandra Pires — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Grzegorz Fijałek and Sandra Pires level at 83.6. Grzegorz Fijałek leads on Longevity, Statistics. Sandra Pires leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fijałek wins: Longevity, Statistics
Pires wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/grzegorz-fijalek-vs-sandra-pires
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fijałek leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 Fijałek | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 303 | 640 |
| 🇧🇷 Pires | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 396 | 736 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FijałekActive | PiresRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 1 | — |
| World Tour titles | 4 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Polish titles | 6 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World Tour wins | — | 30 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Grzegorz Fijałek leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Sandra Pires — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pires scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Fijałek leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fijałek: 83.6, Pires: 83.6.
Make your case for Fijałek vs Pires. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.