Who is better, Beckmann or Smith?
Gudrun Beckmann leads with a GOAT score of 75.5 against 75.3 for Regan Smith — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gudrun Beckmann above Regan Smith: 75.5 vs 75.3. Gudrun Beckmann leads on Longevity, Honours. Regan Smith leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Beckmann wins: Longevity, Honours
Smith wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/gudrun-beckmann-vs-regan-smith
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Beckmann leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Beckmann | 0 | 0 | 52 | 116 | 354 | 458 |
| 🇺🇸 Smith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58.8 | 232.52 | 462.15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeckmannRetired | SmithActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| National titles | 4 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 1 | — |
| National records | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 8 |
| World titles | — | 5 |
| World records | — | 4 |
| Personal best 100 m back (s) | — | 57.13 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 54 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Gudrun Beckmann leads with a GOAT score of 75.5 against 75.3 for Regan Smith — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Smith scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Beckmann leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beckmann: 75.5, Smith: 75.3.
Make your case for Beckmann vs Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.