Who is better, Beckmann or Bukhov?
Gudrun Beckmann leads with a GOAT score of 75.5 against 74.9 for Vladyslav Bukhov — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gudrun Beckmann above Vladyslav Bukhov: 75.5 vs 74.9. Gudrun Beckmann leads on Longevity, Statistics. Vladyslav Bukhov leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Beckmann wins: Longevity, Statistics
Bukhov wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/gudrun-beckmann-vs-vladyslav-bukhov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Beckmann leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Beckmann | 0 | 0 | 52 | 116 | 354 | 458 |
| 🇺🇦 Bukhov | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 367 | 633 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BeckmannRetired | BukhovActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship medals | 1 | 3 |
| National titles | 4 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 1 | — |
| National records | 2 | — |
| European titles | — | 1 |
| Short course world medals | — | 2 |
| Personal best 50 m free (s) | — | 21.29 |
| Ukrainian records | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Gudrun Beckmann leads with a GOAT score of 75.5 against 74.9 for Vladyslav Bukhov — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bukhov scores higher on peak, dominance. Beckmann leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Beckmann: 75.5, Bukhov: 74.9.
Make your case for Beckmann vs Bukhov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.