Who is better, Hägg or Warholm?
Gunder Hägg leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Karsten Warholm — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hägg vs Warholm
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gunder Hägg and Karsten Warholm level at 84.7. Gunder Hägg leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Karsten Warholm leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HäggWinner
84.7Hägg wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Warholm
84.7Warholm wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to AthleticsShareable URL · /compare/gunder-hagg-vs-warholm
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Gunder Hägg
84.7
Hägg leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Gunder Hägg
2. Karsten Warholm
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇳🇴 Karsten Warholm72 major golds
1 season by age 21 · 72 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Hägg — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | HäggRetired | WarholmActive |
|---|---|---|
| World records | 15 | 2 |
| Mile world record | 4.01 | — |
| Swedish titles | 8 | — |
| World records in 1942 | 10 | — |
| Distances with world records | 8 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World golds | — | 3 |
| 400mH best (s) | — | 45.94 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 4 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 95 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hägg84.7
Warholm84.7
FAQ
Where does Warholm beat Hägg?
Warholm scores higher on honours, longevity. Hägg leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Hägg vs Warholm score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hägg: 84.7, Warholm: 84.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hägg vs Warholm. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.